Bagehot's notebook

British politics

Austerity Britain

Is it ethical to borrow a tax break intended for others?

Sep 3rd 2010, 15:54 by Bagehot

AS BRITAIN enters its new age of austerity, the debate on universal benefits is spreading. The BBC recently interviewed a collection of former cabinet ministers, some of them of pensionable age. It is a sign of the times that one of them, a multi-millionaire former deputy prime minister and peer of the realm, found himself admitting under questioning that no, personally, he did not need the free bus pass and winter fuel allowance to which he is entitled.

What of child benefit, paid to all parents, regardless of income? The coalition, it is said, is not minded to introduce means-testing for this, partly because that costs a lot in terms of bureaucracy, and partly for reasons of politics.

Presumably the government could, in the spirit of the Big Society, call for volunteers to forego child benefit, if they feel able to do without it. The benefit is paid tax-free to parents of all children still at school and is worth £20.30 a week for a first child, with £13.40 a week for each subsequent child. But even that step seems doubtful. Watching David Cameron meet voters in Manchester a few weeks ago, I heard him explain that if those paying taxes into a system feel they get nothing back from it, that can have its own negative consequences. I suspect he is right.

Still, the dilemmas keep coming. A universal tax benefit for parents in Britain is that children's clothing is sold free of VAT, which is not the case in much of Europe. Even assuming that British retailers take some of that in profit, it is still noticeable that children's clothes are cheaper than Belgium, for example. Even this posed your blogger with an ethical test this week, as I shopped for sports kit for my children. Hunting for the right junior sizes, I was startled to realise that the largest sizes were not just big, but bigger than the sizes I take: eg, shorts with a 40" waist. That is a large teenager: just when did British children become so big? And as it happens, I needed some sports kit myself: here was some my size, and all tax free. Was it ethical to buy it? The age of austerity was in collision with an age of British obesity. The Big Society was changing meaning before my eyes. Reader, I buckled, and bought.

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

griffysfirstXI

Interesting point about the need for taxpayers to feel they're getting something back - maybe it goes some way towards explaining the "point" of some of the more divisive (and derisory?) tax break ideas like the married couples' allowance...?

Porie

Doug, pretty sure he's saying he bought the ones for himself tax free.

Although that seems rather ridiculous. Couldn't you put all clothes under "children's" categories and as a retailer enjoy the increased demand at the cost of the government?

About Bagehot's notebook

In this blog, our Bagehot columnist surveys the politics of Britain, British life and Britain's place in the world. The column and blog are named after Walter Bagehot, an English journalist who was the editor of The Economist from 1861 to 1877

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
His bloody Valentine
From Newsbook - 1 hrs 6 mins ago
Link exchange
From Free exchange - February 10th, 22:21
The accommodation
From Democracy in America - February 10th, 19:51
Unsatisfactory terminology
From Johnson - February 10th, 19:39
I am the 1%!
From Democracy in America - February 10th, 16:36
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.